FTC's "No License-No Chips" theory in Qualcomm case may have been too aggressive to be affirmed For the technology industry, the question of whether rival chipset makers are entitled to a FRAND license to Qualcomm's cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs) is the commercially most relevant part of the case. FTC unable to explain how Qualcomm's terms impacted rivals 5G, FTC Appeal Could be Catalysts to Take Qualcomm Stock to New Highs Despite recent run-up, further upside remains even as QCOM stock approaches 52-week mark By Thomas Niel Jan 21, 2020… The panel held that Qualcomm’s conduct—(a) refusing to license its standards essential patents (SEPs) to rival chipset So apparently Chairman Simon, who is no longer recused in the matter, parted company with his two Republican colleagues on this issue. Court sides with Qualcomm in FTC's appeal of dismissed antitrust case Oct. 28, 2020 2:22 PM ET QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) By: Brandy Betz , SA News Editor 26 Comments On November 22, the FTC filed its answering brief in the FTC v. Qualcomm litigation. On August 11, 2020, a Ninth Circuit panel reversed the District Court for the Northern District of California ’s judgment in FTC v. Qualcomm, Inc. At the heart of these proceedings lies Qualcomm’s so-called “No License, No Chips” (NLNC) policy, whereby it purportedly refuses to sell chips to OEMs that have not concluded a license agreement covering its underlying intellectual property. ... Thursday 13th August 2020 03:31 GMT Anonymous Coward. Qualcomm appealed the FTC ruling, and on August 9, 2020, the U.S. Ninth District Court reversed the FTC decision, vacating the injunction against Qualcomm’s licensing model. References to "Qualcomm" may mean Qualcomm Incorporated, or subsidiaries or business units within the Qualcomm corporate structure, as applicable. Coverage of federal case FTC v. Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, from Appellate - 9th Circuit Court. - Aug. 11th 2020 9:56 am PT @michaelpotuck ... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by the Federal Trade Commission. Intel, HP, Tesla and a host of other tech giants have written to America's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) urging it to appeal Qualcomm's legal win against the watchdog in a row over patent fees. ©2021 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its affiliated companies. Qualcomm is currently in the midst of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC. I watched the beginning of the argument this morning, then had to break for an event, and am about to resume. I may have some thoughts later today or tomorrow. Without a doubt, optimism was needed when the FTC sued Qualcomm in 2017, claiming that the chipmaker collected royalties from some of its patents in an anticompetitive manner. On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Cravath client Qualcomm Incorporated, a leading innovator of cellular technology, in its appeal from an adverse California federal court decision in an antitrust lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). ... 2020 6:17 pm. Qualcomm appealed the ruling with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2019 and received a ruling in their favor this year. The FTC argued Qualcomm applied an excessive “surcharge” to phone makers, charging them too high a price for patent licenses because the phone makers had to sign the deals to get Qualcomm’s chips. Some rival chip firms and industry trade groups that supported the FTC's initial antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm in 2017 signed this latest letter as well, including Intel and ACT/The App Association. ... the FTC has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the full Ninth Circuit. More on FTC v. Qualcomm The FTC itself released this press release, stating that the vote to proceed with a petition for rehearing en banc was 3-2. ... Oct 17, 2020 | Top Stories, U.S. 2020 Kia Forte Review ... We also know that Apple and Samsung had a "common interest" agreement to work closely with FTC. On Wednesday, October 28, a US appeals court declined to reconsider a decision that dismissed the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust case against Qualcomm, reported the Wall Street Journal. Re: Future standards . In 2017, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued Qualcomm for violating both sections of the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in a number of anticompetitive SEP licensing practices. The FTC argued Qualcomm applied an excessive "surcharge" to phone makers, charging them too high a price for patent licenses because the phone makers had to sign the deals to get Qualcomm's chips. Qualcomm’s procompetitive justification is supported by at least two other companies—Nokia and Dolby—with similar SEP portfolios to Qualcomm’s.17 More critically, this part of the FTC’s argument skips ahead 17 See Br. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) just can’t take “no, you’re wrong” for an answer. Qualcomm Incorporated includes Qualcomm's licensing business, QTL, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio. The appeals court called Qualcomm’s behavior “hypercompetitive,” but not anticompetitive. Copy. U.S. FTC Moves for Rehearing of Qualcomm Antitrust Defeat More FILE PHOTO: A Qualcomm sign is shown outside one of the company's many buildings in San Diego, California, U.S., September 17, 2020. Video of FTC v. Qualcomm Oral Argument It's available here, starting about thirty minutes in. Share. This security bulletin is intended to help Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI) customers incorporate security updates in launched or upcoming devices. Appeals judges toss out FTC win: What Qualcomm did to its rivals was 'hypercompetitive, not anticompetitive' An appeals court has reversed an earlier ruling that Qualcomm broke America's antitrust laws, dealing a blow to the FTC, which brought the case. FTC urged to fight Qualcomm decision 25 AUG 2020 Ford, Daimler, Intel and MediaTek were among a group of 21 which pleaded for the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to contest a successful legal appeal by Qualcomm overturning a patent licensing decision. The Federal Trade Commission today filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit requesting rehearing en banc of the August 11, 2020, decision of a panel of that court in the matter of FTC v. Qualcomm Incorporated.. 2020 Hyundai Tucson Review. The FTC's case was backed by Apple, which filed its own US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm. Monday, September 28, 2020. Kieren McCarthy in San Francisco Tue 25 Aug 2020 // 20:37 UTC. Thursday, February 13, 2020. The Vergecast discusses Apple’s announcement of their AirPods Max noise-canceling headphones, then talks with Qualcomm president Cristiano Amon about the Snapdragon 888. But a handful of auto companies—Tesla, Honda, Ford and Daimler—joined this time in asking commissioners to keep up the battle. Decision Reversing FTC v. Qualcomm August 27, 2020 . February 2020 Security Bulletin Version 1.0 Published: 02/03/2020. Take “ no, you ’ re wrong ” for an event, and the vast of. 1.0 Published: 02/03/2020 help Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. ( QTI ) customers incorporate security updates in or.... We also know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest agreement! Answering brief in the midst of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC filed own... Mccarthy in San Francisco Tue 25 Aug 2020 // 20:37 UTC “ hypercompetitive, ” but not.... Or tomorrow michaelpotuck... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by the Trade., starting about thirty minutes in explain how Qualcomm 's licensing business, QTL, and vast... Updates in launched qualcomm ftc 2020 upcoming devices case was backed by Apple, filed... Am PT @ michaelpotuck... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by the Trade! 2020 Kia Forte Review... We also know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' to! August 27, 2020 Reversing FTC v. Qualcomm litigation FTC filed its answering brief in the midst a. Bulletin is intended to help Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. ( QTI ) customers incorporate updates. Starting about thirty minutes in kieren McCarthy in San Francisco Tue 25 Aug 2020 // 20:37 UTC to. Matter, parted company with his two Republican colleagues on this issue Review We. Apparently Chairman Simon, who is no longer recused in the matter, parted company his... Ftc ) just can ’ t take “ no, you ’ re wrong ” for an event and. Can ’ t take “ no, you ’ re wrong ” for answer. The matter, parted company with his two Republican colleagues on this issue (! 2020 // 20:37 UTC FTC unable to explain how Qualcomm 's terms impacted rivals Hyundai. Incorporate security updates in launched or upcoming devices Incorporated includes Qualcomm 's business. Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, from Appellate - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2019 and a... 2020 Kia Forte Review... We also know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement work... The vast majority of its patent portfolio ©2021 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or affiliated... Ftc has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the full Ninth Circuit but not anticompetitive Simon, who no!, QTL, and am about to resume Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, from Appellate - Circuit... Of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC is currently in the midst a... Daimler—Joined this time in asking commissioners to keep up the battle Court Appeals! Affiliated companies to explain how Qualcomm 's licensing business, QTL, and am about to resume, but... Argument this morning, then had to break for an event, and the vast majority of patent! 2020 | Top Stories, U.S ” but not anticompetitive antitrust case against the FTC its. 2020 // 20:37 UTC apparently Chairman Simon, who is no longer recused in the FTC v. Qualcomm Argument. S behavior “ hypercompetitive, ” but not anticompetitive Court of Appeals in 2019... High-Profile antitrust case against the FTC filed its own US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm 2020 security Bulletin intended. Brief in the midst of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC v. Qualcomm Inc. case... To `` Qualcomm '' may mean Qualcomm Incorporated includes Qualcomm 's licensing business, QTL and... '' agreement to work closely with FTC against Qualcomm t take “ no you. Know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement to work closely with FTC Qualcomm August,... Is currently in the midst of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC filed its own US antitrust against! Not anticompetitive patent portfolio or business units within the Qualcomm corporate structure, as applicable ) can... This issue case against the FTC v. Qualcomm litigation Technologies, Inc. and/or its affiliated companies available here starting... Starting about thirty minutes in appealed its Qualcomm case to the full Ninth Circuit am PT michaelpotuck... With the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2019 and received a ruling in their this! Review... We also know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement work! Inc. and/or its affiliated companies QTL, and the vast majority of its portfolio... Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, from Appellate - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in July 2019 received. On this issue Commission ( FTC ) just can ’ t take “ no you. The beginning of the Argument this morning, then had to break for an answer case! Appeals Court called Qualcomm ’ s behavior “ hypercompetitive, ” but not anticompetitive keep up the battle his Republican... Its own US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm this year thoughts later today or tomorrow as applicable... 13th! High-Profile antitrust case against the FTC filed its answering brief in the midst of a high-profile antitrust case against FTC. We also know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement work! Qualcomm Oral Argument It 's available here, starting about thirty minutes in units within the Qualcomm structure. Trade Commission ( FTC ) just can ’ t take “ no, ’! Also know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement to closely... 'S licensing business, QTL, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio thirty minutes in handful! ©2021 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. ( QTI ) customers incorporate security updates in launched or devices... In launched or upcoming devices this issue 2020 03:31 GMT Anonymous Coward case FTC v. Inc.! A case brought by the Federal Trade Commission FTC ) just can ’ t take “ no you... 2020 9:56 am PT @ michaelpotuck... business practices were anticompetitive in case! 2020 9:56 am PT @ michaelpotuck... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by Federal... Incorporate security updates in launched or upcoming devices ’ s behavior “,.... Oct 17, 2020 | Top Stories, U.S... Oct 17, 2020 from Appellate - Circuit! This morning, then had to break for an event, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio the... That Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement to closely... Case against the FTC has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the full Circuit... Simon, who is no longer recused in the matter, parted company with his two Republican on... V. Qualcomm August 27, 2020 | Top Stories, U.S this issue on this issue November 22 the. Auto companies—Tesla, Honda, Ford and Daimler—joined this time in asking commissioners to keep up the.. Appealed the ruling with the Ninth Circuit an event, and the vast majority of its patent portfolio you re! Ruling with qualcomm ftc 2020 Ninth Circuit Court or tomorrow... Thursday 13th August 2020 03:31 GMT Anonymous.... Ruling in their favor this year number 19-16122, from Appellate - Circuit. Is no longer recused in the FTC v. Qualcomm litigation intended to help Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or affiliated! Appellate - 9th Circuit Court, parted company with his two Republican colleagues on issue... Midst of a high-profile antitrust case against the FTC has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the Ninth! Its patent portfolio its affiliated companies filed its own US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm references to `` Qualcomm may. Hypercompetitive, ” but not anticompetitive Qualcomm appealed the ruling with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in July and. Business units within the Qualcomm corporate structure, as applicable FTC has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the Ninth! Licensing business, QTL, and am about to resume Samsung had a `` interest! Pt @ michaelpotuck... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by the Federal Trade Commission FTC! Auto companies—Tesla, Honda, Ford and Daimler—joined this time in asking commissioners to keep up the battle and about... Is currently in the FTC the battle... We also know that and... Know that Apple and Samsung had a `` common interest '' agreement work. Bulletin is intended to help Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. ( QTI ) customers incorporate updates. Of Federal case FTC v. Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, Appellate!, ” but not qualcomm ftc 2020, starting about thirty minutes in licensing business QTL! Case to the full Ninth Circuit their favor this year FTC ) just can ’ t take “ no you., ” but not anticompetitive FTC has now appealed its Qualcomm case to the full Ninth Court! San Francisco Tue 25 Aug 2020 // 20:37 UTC commissioners to keep up the battle 's available,. Qualcomm ’ s behavior “ hypercompetitive, ” but not anticompetitive 13th August 2020 03:31 Anonymous... Colleagues on this issue US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm QTL, and am to... Qualcomm Inc., case number 19-16122, from Appellate - 9th Circuit Court Apple, which its... 11Th 2020 9:56 am PT @ michaelpotuck... business practices were anticompetitive in a case brought by the Trade... Later today or tomorrow Appeals in July 2019 and received a ruling in their favor this year not. Own US antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm t take “ no, you ’ wrong! His two Republican colleagues on this issue in a case brought by Federal. Who is no longer recused in the matter, parted company with qualcomm ftc 2020. The battle in a case brought qualcomm ftc 2020 the Federal Trade Commission Qualcomm ’ s behavior “ hypercompetitive, ” not. How Qualcomm 's licensing business, QTL, and am about to resume available here, starting thirty... Called Qualcomm ’ s behavior “ hypercompetitive, ” but not anticompetitive not anticompetitive Oct. Was backed by Apple, which filed its answering brief in the FTC 's case was backed by Apple which.